Individuals, specifically chess players themselves, say the darnedest features of chess as well as regarding chess players. Here are a few of our favorite mistaken beliefs regarding the royal video game. Several of these sayings are unquestionably off-target, several of them are ignorant impression, and a few of them are controversies that may or might not be legitimate.
Chess may not be the easiest game to pick up, but it is far from the most prohibitive. There are a few rules about games where neither player wins. One side of this myth is legitimate—- it is difficult, very difficult, to learn to play chess well.
There is some link between chess talent and general intelligence. Chess does involve, after all, using numerous advanced compartments of the brain as skillfully as applicable. People from all walks of life have fun playing chess, several attaining mastery.
This isn’t a misstatement, since chess is for everyone. People who want to call other people unpleasant names should better say,’ chess is only for nerds ‘, but this is plainly untrue. If they want to play chess, that’ s their business.
In 2006, the finest computers play chess better than 99.99% of people, but are evenly leveled in games against the top humans. If, as some experts think, computers are gaining 20– 30 rating points per year, the moment will soon arrive when humans have no chance against the best machines. It should not be overlooked that computers are always trained by teams of human specialists who program them in psychological areas like opening repertoire. Removing this benefit would eliminate their excellence.
Here we run the peril of upsetting the many meritorious chess organizers who have spent years trying to prevail upon the International Olympic Committee (IOC) that chess should be included as an Olympic sport. Lifting light pieces of wood or clicking rapidly on a computer monitor is not physically challenging work. As any quantity of photos from foregone high level chess events will demonstrate, chess players don’t always cut a lean, trim, muscular profile.
Here we try to make amends with those very same organizers who nearly convinced the IOC that chess is a sport. A game between two extraordinary chess masters is full of tension, where superior nerves can make the difference between a winner and an also-ran.
To date it is unquestionable that women have not performed as well as men in chess events. There are many possible reasons for this. One may be that male players are often expert at making female players feel uncomfortable at chess events. The Polgar sisters have gone a long way to convince the chess world that women can play very well. Perhaps one day we will discover that women can even play better than men. No one really knows.
People, particularly chess players themselves, say the darnedest things about chess and about chess players. People who want to call other people unpleasant names should better say,’ chess is only for nerds ‘, but this is plainly untrue. Here we run the peril of upsetting the many meritorious chess organizers who have spent years trying to prevail upon the International Olympic Committee (IOC) that chess should be included as an Olympic sport. As any quantity of photos from foregone high level chess events will demonstrate, chess players don’t always cut a lean, trim, muscular profile.
One may be that male players are often expert at making female players feel uncomfortable at chess events.
✅ Join the RCA Affiliate Program, promote our courses, and get 50% commission – https://chess-teacher.com/partnership/
📥 Download the PGN of this opening – https://bit.ly/3yyKgZa
In this video lesson, GM Igor Smirnov shares with you an unbeatable opening for Black against the White’s first move 1.e4. It is the Rubinstein Variation from the French Defense, which happens after the following moves: 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4.
This variation is named after Akiba Rubinstein and can also arise from a different move order: 3.Nd2 dxe4. White has freer development and more space in the centre, which Black intends to neutralise by playing …c7–c5 at some point.
The great thing about this line for Black is its simplicity. You don’t have to study too much of theory or remember lots of variations. Your setup as Black is almost constant and your position is solid. It is completely risk-free so you can’t lose. You can win though if your opponent makes a small mistake. Watch the video lesson as GM Igor Smirnov explains the common ideas for Black in this solid opening.
00:24 Warm up: a question for you
01:30 Rubinstein Variation in French Defense
03:10 Solid line – Fianchetto setup
04:11 c5 – key move in Black’s setup
05:52 What if White castles queenside?
07:30 Aggressive and immediate c5
09:26 Be careful of this tactics
10:14 How to earn money with chess?
12:12 Prepare your attack
13:19 Sideline-1: White playing Bd3
14:23 Sideline-2: White playing Bg5
15:03 Beware of the tactics, again!
16:34 Solution to the puzzle
#GMSmirnov #ChessOpenings #FrenchDefense
chess,opening,openings,black,white,1.e4,1.e4 e6,french,defense,defence,rubinstein,variation,akiba,legend,master,world champion,solid,aggressive,center,pawn,pawns,fianchetto,c5,b6,bishop,caste,castling,king,kingside,queenside,opposite,side,sideline,mainline,theory,idea,setup,checkmate,mate,tactics,threat,discovered,attack,position